Post-Post-Black Art Hank Willis Thomas and Mickalene Thomas

Author John Haber
http://www.haberarts.com/heavies.htm#

The New Black Heavies

The New Black Heavies

Hank Willis Thomas and Mickalene Thomas have crossed paths more than a few times. Both gained attention among emerging artists, at the Studio Museum in Harlem in 2006. Both have solo shows in spring 2009. Their names alone are sure to link them in search engines and alphabetical listings.
That year in Harlem, their work stood at opposite ends of the museum. One used painting to play against and pay homage to perhaps the most respected African American artist, Romare Bearden. The other used new media to appear almost artless. One showed a woman at ease in a bright interior. The other showed young men in action, on a playground at night. While the woman artist's work has grown glossier still over time, the male artist sends even more mixed messages.
That group exhibition insisted on the diversity of black identity, art, and experience, and both artists have an uneasy relationship to that theme. They focus as much on gender as race—their gender. They both update African American art for street fashion, and they both show off. Mickalene Thomas this spring also curated "The New Black Heavies," and the show's title is only partly ironic. If the Studio Museum helped popularize "post-black" art, they could stand for a post-post-black art. Are heavies the new black?

I yam what I yam

Hank Willis Thomas can sure think on his feet. As usual, he races through enough sources, styles, and media for half a dozen artists, as if trying them on for size. As usual, too, he takes care to leave himself out of the picture. He could be denying an identity imposed by others or riffing on it. He could be a shape shifter—or just another young artist with a sudden reputation and a short attention span. Whichever I choose, he might well agree.
Obviously the choices have special relevance for black identity. At the Studio Museum in "Frequency," Thomases stop-action video had the tensile movements of a street fight. And its playground confrontation ended with a death. The artist's career has had the same combination of raw materials and speed, even if it has not yet settled on something as memorable. Perhaps the ideal artist, like  Miro in the 1930s, refuses to settle for anything, especially authenticity. When I look back at Thomas one day, will things become as clear?
I Am a Man sums it up twenty times over in black and white. Not for him the stark sobriety that Glen Ligon brought to the same title. The text takes off from the sign carried by striking sanitation workers in 1968. Martin Luther King, Jr., came in support to Memphis, where he delivered "I've been to the mountaintop" one day before his death. Thomas in fact appeared in "After 1968: Contemporary Artists and the Civil Rights Legacy," a show at the High Museum of artists born after that date. Here he runs through the text as question (Am I a man?), exhortation (Be a man), and even the boast of a stammering Old Testament god (I am I am)—before ending somewhere between assertion and resignation (I am amen).
Not that anyone will read the Liquitext on canvas from left to right. Other works mime much the same rapid-eye movements in neon. The elements of Pitch Blackness off Whiteness, for one, blink on and off in capital letters and in unpredictable combinations. At the other extreme, Thomas casts transitory or unsettled accounts in stone. He has incised both The Slate Is Clean and Everything Must Go in polished granite. They rest in the center of the floor, like stumbling blocks or tombstones.
These things flirt with identity, like  Rashid Johnspn, but also with the meaningless. As far as I can see, an appropriated photo of Little Richard is meaningless. At other times, the artist insists a little too obviously on the message. Paired photos of women picking cotton come with the legend It Didn't Jest Grow by Itse'f. A view of the open sea, framed by the cutout of an Absolut vodka bottle, risks both at once. The Middle Passage stares down luxury consumers, like those who hang around with Chelsea galleries and emerging artists.
In the side gallery, John Bankston definitely stays on message. He just has not quite finished filling it in. He paints happy figures in a landscape, with the white spaces of coloring books. The figures seem to belong in the nineteenth century, and so do the stiff realism and the garden utopia. Are they Africans or newly arriving slaves, and how deeply does the irony of their good cheer cut? Perhaps the white spaces need some color by numbers.

Heavyweights

It took a long time to get from "Black Male," the Whitney's notorious 1994 show, to a black president. Does that leave a black woman to play the heavy? As it turns out, "The Brand New Heavies" look quite familiar and not even all that heavy. Deal with it.
Jessica Ann Peavy, Lauren Kelley, and Deana Lawson invoke the usual choices—big mamas and invisible daughters, bitches and Barbie dolls, nuts and sluts. Peavy backs her star with the word BITCH, in hot pink on red. Kelley follows a black Barbie on stop-action video. Yet both actors have to look after themselves, without getting up on a pedestal or down in your face. Peavy's may well be bitching, but the soundtrack muffles her words. Kelley's Bay Area librarian has a long day ahead, through a risky male encounter and a troubled sleep.
The videos approach diaries, as with Sophie Calle, but they withhold audible confession. Mickalene Thomas, the curator, compares Peavy to Chantal Akerman. Both use pauses to arrest the progress of vulnerable lives, perhaps their own. Peavy's A Conversation Piece has two channels, intermittently sharing an image. A wall-sized video grid follows another tough woman through a day of obligations and pleasures, and who is to say how one counts cooking, smoking, alcohol, and sex? She stirs her food with a cigarette.
They can look after themselves, but within some serious constraints. That "bitch" is in close up, with huge hoop earrings, but her body is bound in yellow police tape labeled caution. Kelley's heroine has to do a lot of listening—to young men almost as constrained as she by a preposterous stack of books, their own predatory instincts, or her nightmares of revenge. Lawson's photographs come closer still to powerless heavies. Her black women may look surly, but also bruised, battered, and small—dwarfed by the space of a room and a sofa. Her Advertisement looks more like fashion shot, but spots mar the photo's surface.
In just three shows, the gallery has gone for photos that manipulate outsider stereotypes. Aaron Hobson a month before had too many men in cowboy hats and cars, although a yuppie somehow ended up with his tie loose in the East River. Maybe white men think they get to carry on.
Nearly fifteen years after "Black Male," black masculinity still gets more attention than it might well wish—and not just with Hank Willis Thomas. Kehinde Wiley and Barkley Hendricks, who appeared in "Black Male," have had the last two shows at the Studio Museum. Audrey Flack had to transform herself into Marilyn Monroe for "WACK! Art and the Feminist Revolution." Lorna Simpsomhas shown women playing house, but as history, as fugitive slaves. This time, black women do get a life. They just do not let on for sure whether to call it funny, sad, or defiantly vulgar.

Hank Willis Thomas: Artist Exploring Commodification of Black Bodies

Hank Willis Thomas: Artist Exploring Commodification of Black Bodies

http://www.racismreview.com/blog/2010/05/30/hank-willis-thomas-artist/

Hank Willis Thomas: Artist Exploring Commodification of Black Bodies

By Jessie
Today, I visited PS1-Contemporary Arts Center and discovered the fabulous work of Hank Willis Thomas, an artist exploring the commodification of black bodies by corporate advertisers.  The exhibit I saw was called “Unbranded” is a series of images taken from magazine advertisements from 1968 to the present, such as this one from 1978 of an advertisement for pancakes.  The artist removes all text and logos to “reveal what is being sold,” and alters nothing else of the image.
(“Smokin Joe Ain’t Je’mama” 1978/2006)
In statement about this work, Thomas writes:
“I believe that in part, advertising’s success rests on its ability to reinforce generalizations about race, gender, and ethnicity which can be entertaining, sometimes true, and sometimes horrifying, but which at a core level are a reflection of the way a culture views itself or its aspirations.  By ‘unbranding’ advertisements I can literally expose what Roland Barthes refers to as ‘what-goes-without-saying’ in ads, and hopefully encourage viewers to look harder and think deeper about the empire of signs that have become second nature to our experience of life in the modern world.”
Although Thomas’ work includes images of black men and women, he says that he is most interested in exploring the “link between the commodification of African men in the slave trade and the use of black bodies to hawk goods from credit cards to Nikes today.” Thomas’ earlier work, Branded, deals explicitly with branding, from the product logos plastered on athletes and rap stars to the markings that identified slaves.  In an interview Thomas says:
“I think that the irony of the ideal of the black male body is interesting…it is fetishized and adored in advertising but in reality black men are in many ways the most feared and hated bodies of the 21st Century. The majority of this work comes out of the experience of losing my cousin Songha Thomas Willis – he was killed because he was with someone who was wearing a gold chain. It is this idea – that someone could be killed over a tiny commodity. In NYC in the 1980s, people were killed over sneakers and backpacks. Songha was someone who survived DC when it was the murder capital of the country and then came home to Philly and was killed over a commodity. I want to question what makes these commodities so precious that they are worth defining and more importantly taking another person’s life?”
The work is beautiful, thought-provoking, compelling, disturbing – like art should be, in my view.  If you can get to PS1, make sure you see “Unbranded.” If not, you may want to check out Thomas’ online portfolio or his monograph, Pitch Blackness.

Barkley Hendricks

Barkley Hendricks talk at Penn


theartblog.org


At a moment when black power has new meaning, and bell bottoms and lava lamps have had a resurgence, artist Barkley Hendricks came to Penn, sporting dark glasses layered atop a blue beret. His late afternoon talk yesterday comes in advance of the fall opening of his Birth of Cool exhibit at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts (it just closed at the Studio Museum in Harlem and will stop in Santa Monica on its way to Philadelphia).
Barkley Hendricks at Penn before the talk.
Barkley Hendricks at Penn before the talk.
“The city and I have a love-hate relationship. My 2-years younger brother was murdered here,” began the Philadelphia native, who lives and teaches in New London at Connecticut College.
A bit of a charmer, Hendricks is a funny mix of ego and diffidence, discussing his work in terms of its technical challenges and methods–info for students sandwiched between anecdotes about each piece.
Barkley Hendricks, Blood, a reference to Picasso's harlequin paintings
Barkley Hendricks, Blood, a reference to Picasso's harlequin paintings
But it’s not the anecdotes or materials that make this work of particular interest. It’s the beautifully painted content–dark-skinned subjects, reflecting their time and their individuality, yet standing timeless and universal–a sort of African American hagiography, iconic against flat fields of color. Hendricks himself, in one of his few art historical references in the talk, mentioned Byzantine icons. He tipped his hat to Picasso in a couple of paintings, including Blood, a red-on-red portrait (his red period?) of a young man whose stance and plaid clothes call to mind the Picasso’s acrobats in harlequin.
Barkley Hendricks, "Sweet Thang"
Barkley Hendricks, "Sweet Thang"
I particularly liked the information he gave about his choices–choosing a tile pattern for a background in Sweet Thang, adding balloons to “Arriving Soon” (the painting sat incomplete in his studio for a couple of years until the balloons appeared–in the studio and then in the painting), or omitting the word “nihilism” from a subject’s t-shirt. I also like how he told about the sitter in Sweet Thang first pouring out her heart to him until he was moved to tears. “Then she blew that bubble.”
Barkley Hendricks, Arriving Soon
Barkley Hendricks, Arriving Soon
Hendricks, by the way, is a PAFA Certificate holder, where he was one of Louis Sloan’s students; he also has a Yale BFA and MFA,where he studied under Walker Evans.
“Icon for My Man Superman (Superman never saved any black people — Bobby Seale),” 1969.
“Icon for My Man Superman (Superman never saved any black people — Bobby Seale),” 1969.
Hendricks came of age in the ’60s, and that era’s desire for Black empowerment and visibility is reflected in his work. His 1969 painting Icon for My Man Superman has as its subtitle a quote from Black Panther co-founder Bobby Seale–”Superman never saved any black people.” Hendricks, who said he grew up loving comics, recalled that there were no black people in there–but “if there were, they were always blue. They never got the color right.”
"Fela: Amen, Amen, Amen, Amen," 2002. Oil and variegated leaf on canvas, wooden frame, armature, 66 3/4 x 46 3/4 inches.
"Fela: Amen, Amen, Amen, Amen," 2002. Oil and variegated leaf on canvas, wooden frame, armature, 66 3/4 x 46 3/4 inches.
Hendricks is a political painter. His portrait of Nigerian singer Fela Kuti turns him into a saint and icon. Hendricks said the Nigerian government tried to kill the singer. The singer’s mother, died under suspicious circumstances, pushed out of a second-story window. In the frame of the painting is embedded a camera to spy on the gallery. Soon to be installed in the exhibit in Santa Monica, he said he is hoping the camera will be properly hooked up there to stream live video.
But the political content is also subtle. And this is where things get quite interesting.
Barkley L. Hendricks, "Bahsir (Robert Gowens)," 1975. Oil on canvas, 83.5 x 66 inches. Collection the Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University.
Barkley L. Hendricks, "Bahsir (Robert Gowens)," 1975. Oil on canvas, 83.5 x 66 inches. Collection the Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University.
Hendricks’ Byzantine icons are also full-length fashion plates standing against blank photo backdrops. (He has a photography interest and many of his portraits are based on photos, even photos of strangers on the street; he also paints from life).
I am struck by how there’s a conversation that goes on with my old Jimi Hendrix black light poster (it’s not the one that’s all over the internet, but a two-tone purple and green portrait, with the planes of Hendrix’s face running into the background). Hendricks-the-artist plays with white clothing bleeding into white backdrops or black into black backdrops. The clothing-encased body is often flat, but then emerges with luscious dark skinned volume from the collar and cuffs.
He loves people, he loves how they present themselves–their clothes and their attitude. And in those choices of clothing and hairdo, he presents not just character, but also a cultural time capsule that is the figure en costume, each subject sartorially self-exoticized. These are black people not trying to be white people but just being themselves, and everyone’s a character.
Barkley Hendricks, Tequila
Barkley Hendricks, Tequila
I want to say that without Barkley Hendricks, there is no Kehinde Wiley, who also takes academic painting technique and history to express Pop culture. Wiley, like Hendricks, appropriates poses from religious saint paintings, creating often full-length portraits of his street hustlers in hip-hop regalia. Wiley’s settings also are flattened, although Wiley uses wallpaper patterning to domesticate his subjects, the fronds of pattern crossing over their outfits, making street dudes look positively tame and lovable–not to mention gorgeous.
Both artists take subjects with major attitude and humanize the threat their clothing and posture implies. They are inserting African Americans into an European art history with its pale faces and tastes. But Hendricks is about political power and about the individual personality in a way that Wiley is not.
Barkley L. Hendricks’s “Sir Charles, Alias Willie Harris” (1972) is a portrait of a weed dealer as Three Graces.
Barkley L. Hendricks’s “Sir Charles, Alias Willie Harris” (1972) is a portrait of a weed dealer as Three Graces.
To say Hendricks is  political, however, oversimplifies. He’s about African American musicians, especially jazz musicians.  He has a strong sense of connection to people. He showed a slide of a self-portrait in which he placed himself in Virginia, where his family has roots, and where he is called Doc and Ruby’s Oldest Boy, which is the name of the painting.  Hendricks’ anecdotes include his ex-wife, his ex-girlfriend, his models, his friends. His personal life is part of what fuels his art, which is a mix of the personal and the impersonal, the private and the public. He uses song lyrics and titles–like (Marvin Gaye’s) What’s Going On– for his paintings and recently completed a print of jazz musician Dexter Gordon, who starred in the movie Round Midnight. He has embraced them all as his people.
There’s also a sense of humor here, a willingness to laugh at himself and to paint work that has the spark of the real world! A portrait of his wife is called Mon Petit Kumquat. She’s a 6-foot tall woman, heroic in platform shoes,  delicately holding a kumquat between her index finger and her thumb.
Barkley Hendricks, Slick
Barkley Hendricks, Slick
He is able to tell a joke on himself–laugh at some criticism he got from the late Hilton Kramer in the New York Times, who wrote, “Hendricks is brilliantly endowed, but has a tendency toward slickness.” The comment resonates in the titles of two of his paintings. One is a self portrait dressed in all white, “Slick.” The other is a nude self portrait, in athletic socks and a white cap. It is called Brilliantly Endowed. It didn’t come directly out of the Kramer comment, Hendricks suggested. “I took a shower and looked in the mirror. Hey, that’s a painting.” But he grabbed onto the joke, and the picture is richer for it.
It’s that touch that allows Hendricks to deal with touchy subjects and still charm. He knows how to get a lot of mileage out of indirection!





Barkley Hendricks
http://theartblog.org/2009/03/barkley-hendricks-talk/

Rashid Johnson, the "post-black" art movement, and a new take on Olympia

http://www.seattlepi.com/visualart/326980_visual10.html
By REGINA HACKETT
P-I ART CRITIC

Rashid Johnson's paradise is not lost. He lives it every day and seeds his work with its culturally coded signs: black-eyed peas as stars, shea butter as an altar, Afro-Futurism as a fact and "dark matters" (his show's title) as a deep well.
He doesn't need your water; he has a well.
Johnson was part of Thelma Golden's "Freestyle" at the Studio Museum in Harlem in 2001, when he was 24. This was the moment when, according to Golden, "post black" art hit the moment and claimed it.
In part she was thinking about David Hammons, who said once that if James Turrell's investigations of light had been done by a black artist, they would have been seen in the context of color, not light.
Golden hoped that the same might not be true of Johnson's generation, the artists in "Freestyle" who were, she wrote in the exhibit's catalog, "adamant about not being labeled 'black' artists, though their work was steeped, in fact deeply interested, in redefining complex notions of blackness."
Interested in but not oppressed by.
Enter Johnson. He sees the subject of his people as a gift he was given, something like an intuitive understanding of quadratic equations or the ability to fly.
art
ZoomRashid Johnson and James Harris Gallery
Rashid Johnson sprinkled black-eyed peas on these polyester cloths, spray-painted them black and shook loose the peas.
Jacob Lawrence painted slavery and the fight against it. Toni Morrison told slavery's tale in "Beloved." Johnson feels no need to reimagine what has been so powerfully imagined before him.
Instead of engaging the struggles of black people, he wants to explore their strengths, using himself as subject and finding a form for the fluid nature of his aesthetic aspirations on earth.
To create his sky spaces, Johnson laid three polyester gold cloths on the ground, sprinkled black-eyed peas across the surface and spray-painted each field black. When he lifted up the cloths and shook loose the peas, they left behind the impression of stars in a dark sky, three skies actually, hung in the gallery on three hooks. Together, these cloths recall early Sam Gilliam and Richard Tuttle -- Gilliam for their ecstatic sweep and Tuttle for their casual, almost throwaway, perfection.
Johnson began as a photographer, and he remains one. "White Girl" loosely mimics Manet's "Olympia," and pays tribute to the shock of the original. The precise details of the print make Johnson's model too specific to be a symbol. She's a person -- a girl with a cool gaze who has the viewer's number.
Across the room is "The Brother With Knowledge of Other Planets," a reference to John Sayles' movie "The Brother From Another Planet." It's a portrait of an astrophysicist -- a man who literally has the knowledge of the planets Sayles referred to in his title.
"White Girl's" knowledge is carnal and brazen. "The Brother's" is lofty and remote. In the shine on each of their surfaces, they are reflected, like interchangeable parts.
"Shea Butter Monolith" both leans against and stands on a mirror. What you see is what you get. It's an abstract form whose waxy surface asks to be taken seriously as form, and an emblem of the domestic sphere, used primarily by black people to protect their skin against the slings and arrows of a drying environment.
Is it joke? Yes and no. Lighthearted and heartfelt, it slides off the central stage of meaning to make its own cheerful way in the world. The audience can make of it what it wants. The shea butter monolith (and Johnson) will go on, with or without us.
P-I art critic Regina Hackett can be reached at 206-448-8332 or reginahackett@seattlepi.com. Read her Art To Go blog at blog.seattlepi.com/art.